代码评审流程 Code Review Process

完整覆盖 Full Coverage

严格的、有套路的代码评审流程，从发起到处理到验证 Rigorous, structured code review process from initiation through resolution to verification

入口条件 Entry Condition

你有一段代码需要评审，或收到了评审反馈 You have code that needs review, or received review feedback

交付物 Deliverables

代码质量确认，所有评审问题已修复并验证 Code quality confirmed, all review issues fixed and verified

3 个步骤 3 Steps

发起评审 Request Review

多人协作 Multi-Agent

明确评审范围，提供上下文，派遣评审子代理 Define review scope, provide context, dispatch review subagents

请求代码评审（Requesting Code Review）

质量标准 Quality Criteria

- 评审范围明确界定 - 提供必要的设计背景和上下文 - 评审子代理已派遣 - 评审重点已标注 - Review scope clearly defined - Necessary design context provided - Review subagents dispatched - Review focus areas marked

验证门 Verification Gate

评审请求是否包含足够的上下文让评审者理解代码意图？ Does the review request include enough context for reviewers?

处理反馈 Handle Feedback

Solo Solo

技术正确性优先于社交舒适度，先验证反馈再实施 Technical correctness over social comfort — verify feedback before implementing

接收代码评审（Receiving Code Review）

质量标准 Quality Criteria

- 每条反馈都得到技术性回应 - 先验证反馈的正确性，再决定是否实施 - 不合理的反馈要有技术理由拒绝 - 合理的修改已实施 - Every feedback item gets a technical response - Verify correctness of feedback before implementing - Reject unreasonable feedback with technical reasoning - Reasonable changes implemented

验证门 Verification Gate

是否有未回应的评审意见？每条反馈是否都经过了验证？ Any unanswered review comments? Has each feedback been verified?

最终验证 Final Verification

Solo Solo

确保所有评审问题已解决，代码仍然通过测试 Ensure all review issues resolved and code still passes tests

完成前验证（Verification Before Completion）

质量标准 Quality Criteria

- 所有评审意见已处理 - 代码仍然通过全部测试 - 无新引入的问题 - 评审者确认通过 - All review comments addressed - Code still passes all tests - No newly introduced issues - Reviewer confirms approval

验证门 Verification Gate

评审问题是否全部解决？测试是否全部通过？ All review issues resolved? All tests passing?